The diamond saw blade case was filed by the US industry in 2005. Although the US Department of Commerce had already made a final ruling on the dumping of Chinese companies, the case was finally settled with the US International Trade Commission's ruling that there was no industry damage. Later, the US industry filed an appeal against the US International Trade Commission's ruling and successfully overturned the ruling in a few years. At the end of the appeal against the US International Trade Commission's ruling, the appeal against the US Department of Commerce's ruling also began (the US Department of Commerce's ruling was frozen because of the US International Trade Commission's ruling). In other words, the US court began reviewing the ruling after the US Department of Commerce ruled for six years.
In the original final ruling, the US Department of Commerce ruled that responding to Chinese companies has proved that they are legally and de facto independent of the Chinese government, so the corresponding tax rate applies to Chinese companies. In this case, although the Chinese government entity China Iron and Steel Research Group Co., Ltd. ("China Steel Research") partially holds the shares of the responding company, the US Department of Commerce has ruled that the responding company can apply a separate tax rate. In the ruling, the analysis of the US Department of Commerce focused on the manufacturer of the product under investigation and determined that the company was not under the control of the Chinese government.
When appealing to the US Court of International Trade, the US industry argued that the US Department of Commerce did not consider the impact of government indirect investment on business operations. The US Court of International Trade recognizes the claims of the US industry and sends the case back to the US Department of Commerce for re-examination in order to make a more detailed analysis of the impact of government indirect investment on the company. After the US ruling was appealed to the US International Trade Court for the second time, the US Department of Commerce finally concluded in a protest that the Chinese responding company failed to prove that it was in fact not under the control of the Chinese government. Specifically, the US Department of Commerce has determined that Sinosteel Research has the ability to influence the selection of management of responding companies by exercising shareholder rights. Although the case was finally appealed to the higher court of appeal in 2015, the Court of Appeal upheld the original judgment. The US Department of Commerce still decided not to participate in the appeal in the event of a controversial decision, stating that it did not completely disagree with the outcome of the case.
dedicated to steel Hot/Cold Rolling Mill Equipment developed high-tech enterprises, the company has a number of independent research and development of the franchise, ultra-high-quality cost-effective in the industry chasing far ahead
Mutrade car parking tower, ATP series are a type of automatic tower parking system, that is made of a steel structure and can store 20 to 70 cars at multilevel parking racks by using high speed lifting system, to extremely maximize the usage of limited land in downtown and simplify the experience of car parking. By swiping IC card or inputting the space number on operation panel, as well as shared with information of parking management system, the desired platform will move to entrance level of the parking tower automatically and quickly.
Scissior Parking Mate,Scissor Parking Mate,Best Scissior Parking Mate,Scissior Parking Mate For Sale
Taiyaun JDS Machinery And Equipment Co., Ltd. , https://www.ccagoods.com